Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs South Sudan, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0
in 2019
South Sudan, Republic of
0
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
182nd
South Sudan, Republic of rank
182nd
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 0 against 0 in South Sudan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Sudan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 182nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or South Sudan, Republic of?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 0 against 0 in South Sudan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 182nd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.