Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guyana: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Democratic Republic of Congo
0
in 2019
Guyana
0
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
180th
Guyana rank
180th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Guyana
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Guyana, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 180th and Guyana ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Democratic Republic of Congo or Guyana?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0 against 0 in Guyana as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Guyana?
0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Guyana?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Guyana rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 180th and Guyana ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.