Colombia vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Colombia
72.19
in 2019
Seychelles
74.77
in 2019
Colombia rank
111th
Seychelles rank
108th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Colombia
  • Seychelles
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 74.77 against 72.19 in Colombia, a difference of 2.58.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 111th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 188 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Colombia or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 74.77 against 72.19 in Colombia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Colombia and Seychelles?
2.58, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Seychelles?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Colombia and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Colombia ranks 111th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.