Central African Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Central African Republic
72.19
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
73.22
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
113th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Central African Republic
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 73.22 against 72.19 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Central African Republic or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 73.22 against 72.19 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.03, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Central African Republic ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.