Cambodia vs Myanmar: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Cambodia
22.49
in 2019
Myanmar
15.38
in 2019
Cambodia rank
170th
Myanmar rank
172nd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Myanmar
05101520201420162019

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 22.49 against 15.38 in Myanmar, a difference of 7.11.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.5 times Myanmar's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 170th and Myanmar ranks 172nd of 188 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Cambodia or Myanmar?
Cambodia, at 22.49 against 15.38 in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Cambodia and Myanmar?
7.11, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Myanmar?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Myanmar rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Cambodia ranks 170th and Myanmar ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.