Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Bosnia and Herzegovina
98.03
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
97.93
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
49th
United Arab Emirates rank
50th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 98.03 against 97.93 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and United Arab Emirates ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Bosnia and Herzegovina or United Arab Emirates?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 98.03 against 97.93 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.1, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and United Arab Emirates ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.