Barbados vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Barbados
72.19
in 2019
Maldives
72.19
in 2019
Barbados rank
111th
Maldives rank
111th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Barbados
  • Maldives
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 72.19 against 72.19 in Maldives, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 111th and Maldives ranks 111th of 188 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Barbados or Maldives?
Barbados, at 72.19 against 72.19 in Maldives as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Barbados and Maldives?
0, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Maldives?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Barbados and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Barbados ranks 111th and Maldives ranks 111th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.