Azerbaijan vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Azerbaijan
83.73
in 2019
Rwanda
82.84
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
99th
Rwanda rank
100th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Rwanda
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 83.73 against 82.84 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.89.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 188 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Azerbaijan or Rwanda?
Azerbaijan, at 83.73 against 82.84 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Azerbaijan and Rwanda?
0.89, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Rwanda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Azerbaijan ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.