Australia vs Jordan: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Australia
96.45
in 2019
Jordan
97.04
in 2019
Australia rank
56th
Jordan rank
53rd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Australia
  • Jordan
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 97.04 against 96.45 in Australia, a difference of 0.59.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Australia or Jordan?
Jordan, at 97.04 against 96.45 in Australia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Australia and Jordan?
0.59, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Jordan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Australia and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Australia ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.