Antigua and Barbuda vs Madagascar, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Antigua and Barbuda
70.61
in 2019
Madagascar, Republic of
71.65
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
131st
Madagascar, Republic of rank
128th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Madagascar, Republic of
How they compare
Madagascar, Republic of currently reports 71.65 against 70.61 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 131st and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 128th of 190 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Antigua and Barbuda or Madagascar, Republic of?
- Madagascar, Republic of, at 71.65 against 70.61 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Antigua and Barbuda and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 1.04, with Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Madagascar, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 131st and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 128th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.