Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Türkiye: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
85.42
in 2014
Türkiye
85.42
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st
Türkiye rank
51st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Türkiye
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 85.42 against 85.42 in Türkiye, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st and Türkiye ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.58 | 78.75 | 0.8333 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 85 | 85.42 | 0.4167 | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Türkiye?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 85.42 against 85.42 in Türkiye as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Türkiye?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Türkiye?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Türkiye rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st and Türkiye ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.