Slovenia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Slovenia
79.17
in 2014
Sri Lanka
79.17
in 2014
Slovenia rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
75th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Slovenia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.83 | 65.42 | 5.42 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 77.92 | 71.67 | 6.25 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Slovenia or Sri Lanka?
- Slovenia, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Slovenia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Slovenia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Slovenia ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.