Slovak Republic vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Slovak Republic
79.17
in 2014
Sri Lanka
79.17
in 2014
Slovak Republic rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
75th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Slovak Republic
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5 | 65.42 | 2.08 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 79.17 | 71.67 | 7.5 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Slovak Republic or Sri Lanka?
- Slovak Republic, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Slovak Republic and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Slovak Republic ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.