Slovak Republic vs Slovenia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Slovak Republic
79.17
in 2014
Slovenia
79.17
in 2014
Slovak Republic rank
75th
Slovenia rank
75th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Slovak Republic
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 75th and Slovenia ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovak Republic averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5 | 70.83 | 3.33 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 79.17 | 77.92 | 1.25 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Slovak Republic or Slovenia?
- Slovak Republic, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Slovak Republic and Slovenia?
- 0, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Slovak Republic and Slovenia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Slovak Republic ranks 75th and Slovenia ranks 75th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.