Singapore vs United States of America: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Singapore
100
in 2014
United States of America
100
in 2014
Singapore rank
1st
United States of America rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Singapore
- United States of America
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 100 against 100 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Singapore or United States of America?
- Singapore, at 100 against 100 in United States of America as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Singapore and United States of America?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United States of America?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Singapore and United States of America rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Singapore ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.