Romania vs Turkey: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Romania
85.42
in 2014
Turkey
85.42
in 2014
Romania rank
51st
Turkey rank
51st

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Romania
  • Turkey
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Romania currently reports 85.42 against 85.42 in Turkey, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Turkey ahead.

Romania ranks 51st and Turkey ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 79.17 78.75 0.4167 Romania
2010s 85.42 85.42 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Romania or Turkey?
Romania, at 85.42 against 85.42 in Turkey as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Romania and Turkey?
0, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Romania and Turkey rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Romania ranks 51st and Turkey ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.