Romania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Romania
85.42
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
85.42
in 2014
Romania rank
51st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Romania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Romania currently reports 85.42 against 85.42 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Romania ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.17 | 79.58 | 0.4166 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 85.42 | 85 | 0.4167 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Romania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Romania, at 85.42 against 85.42 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Romania ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.