Romania vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Romania
85.42
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
85.42
in 2014
Romania rank
51st
Saudi Arabia rank
51st

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Romania
  • Saudi Arabia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Romania currently reports 85.42 against 85.42 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Romania ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 79.17 78.75 0.4167 Romania
2010s 85.42 85.42 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Romania or Saudi Arabia?
Romania, at 85.42 against 85.42 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Romania and Saudi Arabia?
0, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Saudi Arabia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Romania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Romania ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.