Pakistan vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Pakistan
69.38
in 2014
Vietnam
68.75
in 2014
Pakistan rank
110th
Vietnam rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Pakistan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 69.38 against 68.75 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.63.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vietnam ahead.
Pakistan ranks 110th and Vietnam ranks 111th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.92 | 63.33 | 0.4166 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 68.58 | 67.92 | 0.6667 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Pakistan or Vietnam?
- Pakistan, at 69.38 against 68.75 in Vietnam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Pakistan and Vietnam?
- 0.63, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Vietnam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Pakistan ranks 110th and Vietnam ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.