Nigeria vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Nigeria
64.75
in 2014
Palestine, State of
64.58
in 2014
Nigeria rank
127th
Palestine, State of rank
128th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Nigeria
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 64.75 against 64.58 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Nigeria ranks 127th and Palestine, State of ranks 128th of 184 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.92 | 60.42 | 7.5 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 63.4 | 64.58 | 1.18 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Nigeria or Palestine, State of?
- Nigeria, at 64.75 against 64.58 in Palestine, State of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Nigeria and Palestine, State of?
- 0.17, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Palestine, State of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Nigeria and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Nigeria ranks 127th and Palestine, State of ranks 128th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.