Netherlands vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Netherlands
97.92
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
97.92
in 2014
Netherlands rank
6th
United Arab Emirates rank
6th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Netherlands
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 97.92 against 97.92 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 183 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.92 | 94.17 | 3.75 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 97.92 | 97.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Netherlands or United Arab Emirates?
- Netherlands, at 97.92 against 97.92 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Netherlands and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Netherlands ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 6th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.