Netherlands vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Netherlands
97.92
in 2014
Switzerland
95.83
in 2014
Netherlands rank
6th
Switzerland rank
9th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Netherlands
- Switzerland
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 97.92 against 95.83 in Switzerland, a difference of 2.09.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 6th and Switzerland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.92 | 95.83 | 2.08 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 97.92 | 95.83 | 2.08 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Netherlands or Switzerland?
- Netherlands, at 97.92 against 95.83 in Switzerland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Netherlands and Switzerland?
- 2.09, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Switzerland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Netherlands ranks 6th and Switzerland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.