Namibia vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Namibia
62.5
in 2014
Sierra Leone
60.42
in 2014
Namibia rank
131st
Sierra Leone rank
133rd

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Namibia
  • Sierra Leone
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 62.5 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 2.08.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 181 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 62.5 50.83 11.67 Namibia
2010s 62.5 60.83 1.67 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Namibia or Sierra Leone?
Namibia, at 62.5 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Namibia and Sierra Leone?
2.08, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sierra Leone?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Namibia and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Namibia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.