Mozambique vs Nicaragua: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Mozambique
68.75
in 2014
Nicaragua
68.75
in 2014
Mozambique rank
111th
Nicaragua rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Mozambique
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 68.75 against 68.75 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 111th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 42.5 | 13.75 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 65 | 65.42 | 0.4167 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mozambique or Nicaragua?
- Mozambique, at 68.75 against 68.75 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mozambique and Nicaragua?
- 0, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mozambique and Nicaragua rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Mozambique ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.