Mauritania vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Mauritania
47.92
in 2014
Sudan
45.83
in 2014
Mauritania rank
154th
Sudan rank
157th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Mauritania
- Sudan
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 47.92 against 45.83 in Sudan, a difference of 2.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 154th and Sudan ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.17 | 23.33 | 15.83 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 42.92 | 45.83 | 2.92 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mauritania or Sudan?
- Mauritania, at 47.92 against 45.83 in Sudan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mauritania and Sudan?
- 2.09, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sudan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritania and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Mauritania ranks 154th and Sudan ranks 157th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.