Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Malaysia
89.58
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
89.58
in 2014
Malaysia rank
37th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
37th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Malaysia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 89.58 against 89.58 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 184 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.42 | 83.33 | 2.08 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 87.92 | 87.08 | 0.8334 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Malaysia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Malaysia, at 89.58 against 89.58 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Malaysia ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.