Malawi vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Malawi
41.67
in 2014
Nepal
29.17
in 2014
Malawi rank
159th
Nepal rank
162nd

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Malawi
  • Nepal
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 41.67 against 29.17 in Nepal, a difference of 12.5.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.

Malawi ranks 159th and Nepal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 20.42 24.58 4.17 Nepal
2010s 35.83 27.08 8.75 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Malawi or Nepal?
Malawi, at 41.67 against 29.17 in Nepal as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Malawi and Nepal?
12.5, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Malawi ranks 159th and Nepal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.