Madagascar vs Russia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Madagascar
66.67
in 2014
Russia
68.54
in 2014
Madagascar rank
117th
Russia rank
116th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Russia
204060200520092014

How they compare

Russia currently reports 68.54 against 66.67 in Madagascar, a difference of 1.87.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russia ahead.

Madagascar ranks 117th and Russia ranks 116th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Russia Difference Ahead
2000s 40.42 62.5 22.08 Russia
2010s 66.67 64.92 1.75 Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Madagascar or Russia?
Russia, at 68.54 against 66.67 in Madagascar as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Madagascar and Russia?
1.87, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Russia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Madagascar and Russia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Madagascar ranks 117th and Russia ranks 116th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.