Lesotho vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Lesotho
47.92
in 2014
Mauritania
47.92
in 2014
Lesotho rank
154th
Mauritania rank
154th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Lesotho
  • Mauritania
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 47.92 against 47.92 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.

Lesotho ranks 154th and Mauritania ranks 154th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 20.83 39.17 18.33 Mauritania
2010s 47.92 42.92 5 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Lesotho or Mauritania?
Lesotho, at 47.92 against 47.92 in Mauritania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Lesotho and Mauritania?
0, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mauritania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Lesotho and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Lesotho ranks 154th and Mauritania ranks 154th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.