South Korea vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
South Korea
95.83
in 2014
United Kingdom
95.83
in 2014
South Korea rank
9th
United Kingdom rank
9th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- South Korea
- United Kingdom
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 95.83 against 95.83 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.
South Korea ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 181 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.17 | 91.67 | 2.5 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 95.42 | 95.83 | 0.4167 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), South Korea or United Kingdom?
- South Korea, at 95.83 against 95.83 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between South Korea and United Kingdom?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- South Korea ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.