South Korea vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
South Korea
95.83
in 2014
Netherlands
97.92
in 2014
South Korea rank
9th
Netherlands rank
6th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- South Korea
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 97.92 against 95.83 in South Korea, a difference of 2.09.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.17 | 97.92 | 8.75 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 95.42 | 97.92 | 2.5 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), South Korea or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 97.92 against 95.83 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between South Korea and Netherlands?
- 2.09, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Netherlands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- South Korea ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.