Kenya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Kenya
58.33
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
58.33
in 2014
Kenya rank
141st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Kenya
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 58.33 against 58.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Kenya ranks 141st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.25 | 56.25 | 10 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 57.92 | 0.4167 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Kenya or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Kenya, at 58.33 against 58.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Kenya ranks 141st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.