Iran vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Iran
60.42
in 2014
Sierra Leone
60.42
in 2014
Iran rank
133rd
Sierra Leone rank
133rd
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Iran
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Iran currently reports 60.42 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 133rd and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.75 | 50.83 | 7.92 | Iran |
| 2010s | 60.42 | 60.83 | 0.4166 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Iran or Sierra Leone?
- Iran, at 60.42 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Iran and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Iran and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Iran ranks 133rd and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.