ISL vs PAN: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
ISL
91.67
in 2014
PAN
91.67
in 2014
ISL rank
24th
PAN rank
24th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- ISL
- PAN
How they compare
ISL currently reports 91.67 against 91.67 in PAN, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, PAN has been ahead every year.
ISL ranks 24th and PAN ranks 24th of 181 countries.
PAN has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ISL | PAN | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 91.67 | 1.67 | PAN |
| 2010s | 86.67 | 91.67 | 5 | PAN |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), ISL or PAN?
- ISL, at 91.67 against 91.67 in PAN as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between ISL and PAN?
- 0, with ISL ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ISL and PAN?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do ISL and PAN rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- ISL ranks 24th and PAN ranks 24th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.