Iceland vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Iceland
91.67
in 2014
Mauritius
91.67
in 2014
Iceland rank
24th
Mauritius rank
24th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 91.67 against 91.67 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 90 85.42 4.58 Iceland
2010s 86.67 91.67 5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Iceland or Mauritius?
Iceland, at 91.67 against 91.67 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Iceland and Mauritius?
0, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Iceland ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.