Hungary vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Hungary
77.08
in 2014
Indonesia
77.08
in 2014
Hungary rank
84th
Indonesia rank
84th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Hungary
  • Indonesia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 77.08 against 77.08 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 84th and Indonesia ranks 84th of 181 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 79.17 71.67 7.5 Hungary
2010s 77.92 77.08 0.8334 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Hungary or Indonesia?
Hungary, at 77.08 against 77.08 in Indonesia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Hungary and Indonesia?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Indonesia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hungary and Indonesia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Hungary ranks 84th and Indonesia ranks 84th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.