Hong Kong vs United States: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Hong Kong
100
in 2014
United States
100
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
1st
United States rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Hong Kong
- United States
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 100 against 100 in United States, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 184 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95 | 100 | 5 | United States |
| 2010s | 99.58 | 100 | 0.4167 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Hong Kong or United States?
- Hong Kong, at 100 against 100 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Hong Kong and United States?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and United States rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.