Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Hong Kong, China
100
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Singapore
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 100 against 100 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95 | 100 | 5 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 99.58 | 100 | 0.4167 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
- Hong Kong, China, at 100 against 100 in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.