Haiti vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Haiti
54.17
in 2014
Uganda
54.17
in 2014
Haiti rank
145th
Uganda rank
145th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Haiti
  • Uganda
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 54.17 against 54.17 in Uganda, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Haiti ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 145th of 181 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 25 37.92 12.92 Uganda
2010s 45 47.08 2.08 Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Haiti or Uganda?
Haiti, at 54.17 against 54.17 in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Haiti and Uganda?
0, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Uganda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Haiti and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Haiti ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 145th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.