Guinea vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Guinea
37.5
in 2014
Sudan
45.83
in 2014
Guinea rank
160th
Sudan rank
157th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Guinea
  • Sudan
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 45.83 against 37.5 in Guinea, a difference of 8.33.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 41.67 23.33 18.33 Guinea
2010s 37.5 45.83 8.33 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea or Sudan?
Sudan, at 45.83 against 37.5 in Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea and Sudan?
8.33, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Guinea ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.