Guinea vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Guinea
37.5
in 2014
Malawi
41.67
in 2014
Guinea rank
160th
Malawi rank
159th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 41.67 against 37.5 in Guinea, a difference of 4.17.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 160th and Malawi ranks 159th of 181 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.67 | 20.42 | 21.25 | Guinea |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 35.83 | 1.67 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 41.67 against 37.5 in Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea and Malawi?
- 4.17, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guinea ranks 160th and Malawi ranks 159th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.