Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Guinea-Bissau
60.42
in 2014
Togo
62.5
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
133rd
Togo rank
131st

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Togo
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Togo currently reports 62.5 against 60.42 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2.08.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 133rd and Togo ranks 131st of 181 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 57.08 58.33 1.25 Togo
2010s 60.42 62.5 2.08 Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea-Bissau or Togo?
Togo, at 62.5 against 60.42 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
2.08, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Togo rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 133rd and Togo ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.