Guinea-Bissau vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Guinea-Bissau
60.42
in 2014
Sierra Leone
60.42
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Sierra Leone rank
135th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 60.42 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Sierra Leone ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.08 | 50.83 | 6.25 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 60.42 | 60.83 | 0.4166 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea-Bissau or Sierra Leone?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 60.42 against 60.42 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Sierra Leone ranks 135th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.