Ghana vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Ghana
72.92
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
75
in 2014
Ghana rank
96th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
93rd
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Ghana
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 75 against 72.92 in Ghana, a difference of 2.08.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Ghana ranks 96th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.42 | 75.42 | 15 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 72.92 | 77.92 | 5 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Ghana or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 75 against 72.92 in Ghana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Ghana and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.08, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ghana and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Ghana ranks 96th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.