GHA vs GUY: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
GHA
72.92
in 2014
GUY
72.92
in 2014
GHA rank
95th
GUY rank
95th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- GHA
- GUY
How they compare
GHA currently reports 72.92 against 72.92 in GUY, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was GUY ahead.
GHA ranks 95th and GUY ranks 95th of 181 countries.
GUY has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | GHA | GUY | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.42 | 69.17 | 8.75 | GUY |
| 2010s | 72.92 | 72.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), GHA or GUY?
- GHA, at 72.92 against 72.92 in GUY as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between GHA and GUY?
- 0, with GHA ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for GHA and GUY?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do GHA and GUY rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- GHA ranks 95th and GUY ranks 95th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.