Finland vs Grenada: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Finland
93.75
in 2014
Grenada
93.75
in 2014
Finland rank
17th
Grenada rank
17th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Finland
  • Grenada
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Finland currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Grenada, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 17th and Grenada ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 93.75 76.25 17.5 Finland
2010s 93.75 92.92 0.8333 Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Finland or Grenada?
Finland, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Grenada as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Finland and Grenada?
0, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Grenada?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Finland and Grenada rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Finland ranks 17th and Grenada ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.