Estonia vs Kosovo: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Estonia
100
in 2014
Kosovo
81.25
in 2014
Estonia rank
1st
Kosovo rank
1st

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Estonia
  • Kosovo
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 100 against 81.25 in Kosovo, a difference of 18.75.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 100 77.08 22.92 Estonia
2010s 100 79.58 20.42 Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Estonia or Kosovo?
Estonia, at 100 against 81.25 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Estonia and Kosovo?
18.75, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kosovo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Estonia and Kosovo rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Estonia ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.