Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Estonia
100
in 2014
Hong Kong, China
100
in 2014
Estonia rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Estonia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 100 against 100 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 95 | 5 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 100 | 99.58 | 0.4167 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
- Estonia, at 100 against 100 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Estonia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.