Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Eritrea
8.33
in 2014
Zimbabwe
2.08
in 2014
Eritrea rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
172nd
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Eritrea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 8.33 against 2.08 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 4.0 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.33 | 3.33 | 0 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 8.33 | 2.08 | 6.25 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Eritrea or Zimbabwe?
- Eritrea, at 8.33 against 2.08 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
- 6.25, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.