Eritrea vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Eritrea
8.33
in 2014
Zambia
6.25
in 2014
Eritrea rank
169th
Zambia rank
171st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Eritrea
- Zambia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 8.33 against 6.25 in Zambia, a difference of 2.08.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Zambia ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.33 | 2.08 | 1.25 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 8.33 | 6.25 | 2.08 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Eritrea or Zambia?
- Eritrea, at 8.33 against 6.25 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Eritrea and Zambia?
- 2.08, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Zambia ranks 171st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.